The Wrong Default

Thomas Tornatore on AI and governance

A default is just governance without a named author.

When AI goes wrong, it is usually by default, not design.
Each edition traces one real case to the decision nobody owned, and what to check in yours.

Latest edition

An architectural cluster of servers rests on one narrow gold foundation, illustrating concentrated financial support.

Ownership & accountability

The Man Who Paid for the Boom

Jensen Huang resigned as Nvidia's CEO. The headlines are about his personal life. The useful question is who was paying for the AI boom, and what happens when the person signing the checks leaves.

Read the essay

Recent editions

Browse the library
An empty chair at a meeting table casts the shadow of a microphone.

The Notetaker Nobody Invited

I denied a notetaker and received the transcript anyway. The person who can start the recording is not necessarily the person who can stop it.

A clock hand becomes a strip of paper climbing a staircase of work.

The Hour Is a Decision

The time AI saves is being spent. Rarely by a decision anyone can point to.

A blank space in a document casts the shadow of an empty chair.

The Sentence With No One in It

When a decision goes wrong, the person who made it is often the first thing to disappear. They disappear from the sentence before they disappear from anything else.

New here

Three ways into
the argument.

Start with the question closest to your work.

01

Governance Theater

When having controls is not the same as being governed.

02

The Chatbot That Practiced Medicine

When existing obligations already reach a new technology.

03

What Your AI Contract Doesn't Cover

When the terms leave part of the decision unspoken.

Explore a case

The recorder was refused.
The transcript arrived.

In The Notetaker Nobody Invited, I describe two meetings where attempts to stop a notetaker failed. Follow the story in four parts.

An empty chair at a meeting table casts the shadow of a microphone.
Conceptual illustration. The products and recording methods in these two meetings have not been established.
01The first meeting

The participant list looked clear.

I was hosting a meeting when an attendee tried to add an AI notetaker. I denied it entry, and none appeared in the participant list. Afterward, an automated email delivered a recording, transcript, and summary. I could not establish how the meeting had been captured.

02The second meeting

The notetaker kept returning.

In another meeting, participants removed a notetaker after it posted a recording notice. About two minutes later, it returned. The account holder tried to stop it, then left the call. The notetaker stayed. We had to end the meeting.

03The people affected

The patient did not choose the account.

The essay uses a hypothetical example: a patient describes a symptom while a clinician records with a notetaker, without asking. The clinician chooses the account and its terms. The patient's words still go to a third party. Fixing the setup later cannot undo that disclosure.

04The practical test

Test what happens when someone says no.

The organization needs to decide which notetakers may be used, for which conversations, and who can approve an exception. It must also test whether the host and account holder can stop recording. If they cannot, there needs to be an agreed next step, including who can end the meeting.

Read the full essay and sources

From the essays to the method

A decision has an owner.
Give it a structure.

The decision frameworks take this question into four settings.

Explore all decision frameworks
Thomas Tornatore at his desk

Who writes it

Thomas Tornatore

I write about how decisions become defaults, who inherits their consequences, and what it takes to own them on purpose.

About Thomas and the publication